Oversize Threshold and Freight Impact: Difference between revisions

From Seasons 4 Wiki
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Hi Team,
Hi Team,



I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of '''Load E883''', which was built at '''144.5 inches wide'''.
I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of '''Load E883''', which was built at '''144.5 inches wide'''.



'''Why This Matters:'''
'''Why This Matters:'''



Any load over '''102 inches (8 feet 6 inches)''' in width is considered '''oversize (OD)''' in every state. That means even if a unit is 103" wide, it's subject to:
Any load over '''102 inches (8 feet 6 inches)''' in width is considered '''oversize (OD)''' in every state. That means even if a unit is 103" wide, it's subject to:



'''• Permitting requirements'''
'''• Permitting requirements'''
Line 16: Line 20:


'''• Route restrictions''' and bridge/clearance checks
'''• Route restrictions''' and bridge/clearance checks



We try to keep all units at '''143 inches or less''' because '''144 inches (12 feet)''' is a critical regulatory threshold. Once a load hits 144" or more:
We try to keep all units at '''143 inches or less''' because '''144 inches (12 feet)''' is a critical regulatory threshold. Once a load hits 144" or more:



• It enters a higher risk/penalty category
• It enters a higher risk/penalty category
Line 24: Line 30:


• Freight costs rise significantly due to extra coordination, permits, and escorts
• Freight costs rise significantly due to extra coordination, permits, and escorts



'''Real-World Example – Load E883:'''
'''Real-World Example – Load E883:'''



Load E883 was built at '''144.5" wide''', pushing it over the 12-foot mark. As a result, it now requires:
Load E883 was built at '''144.5" wide''', pushing it over the 12-foot mark. As a result, it now requires:



'''• Permits in every state along the route'''
'''• Permits in every state along the route'''
Line 36: Line 45:


• An estimated '''$1,000–$1,500 increase in freight cost'''
• An estimated '''$1,000–$1,500 increase in freight cost'''



This one example highlights why we don’t build right up to the 144" limit — there’s no margin for error, and the smallest overage can have significant downstream impact.
This one example highlights why we don’t build right up to the 144" limit — there’s no margin for error, and the smallest overage can have significant downstream impact.



Design Guideline:
'''Design Guideline:'''



• Please '''design and quote units at 143" or less'''
• Please '''design and quote units at 143" or less'''
Line 46: Line 58:


• Verify final specs before release to avoid costly oversize surprises
• Verify final specs before release to avoid costly oversize surprises



Thanks for your attention to this. Even one inch can make a big difference when it comes to shipping efficiency, compliance, and cost.
Thanks for your attention to this. Even one inch can make a big difference when it comes to shipping efficiency, compliance, and cost.



Best regards,
Best regards,



Regina Marrone
Regina Marrone

Revision as of 20:31, 23 July 2025

Return to Engineering Main Menu

Hi Team,


I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of Load E883, which was built at 144.5 inches wide.


Why This Matters:


Any load over 102 inches (8 feet 6 inches) in width is considered oversize (OD) in every state. That means even if a unit is 103" wide, it's subject to:


• Permitting requirements

• Daylight-only travel restrictions

• No weekend or holiday movement in most jurisdictions

• Route restrictions and bridge/clearance checks


We try to keep all units at 143 inches or less because 144 inches (12 feet) is a critical regulatory threshold. Once a load hits 144" or more:


• It enters a higher risk/penalty category

• Many states begin to require escort vehicles

• Freight costs rise significantly due to extra coordination, permits, and escorts


Real-World Example – Load E883:


Load E883 was built at 144.5" wide, pushing it over the 12-foot mark. As a result, it now requires:


• Permits in every state along the route

• Escort vehicles in several states

• Compliance with restricted travel hours

• An estimated $1,000–$1,500 increase in freight cost


This one example highlights why we don’t build right up to the 144" limit — there’s no margin for error, and the smallest overage can have significant downstream impact.


Design Guideline:


• Please design and quote units at 143" or less

• Coordinate early with Transportation if wider designs are being considered

• Verify final specs before release to avoid costly oversize surprises


Thanks for your attention to this. Even one inch can make a big difference when it comes to shipping efficiency, compliance, and cost.


Best regards,


Regina Marrone

Transportation Manager

P: (770)489-0716 Ext. 1718

F: (678) 766-1039