Oversize Threshold and Freight Impact: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<p style="text-align: right;">Return to [[Engineering|Engineering Main Menu]]</p> |
<p style="text-align: right;">Return to [[Engineering|Engineering Main Menu]]</p> |
||
<u>Email from Regina Marrone on 7/23/25</u> |
|||
Hi Team, |
Hi Team, |
||
I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of Load E883, which was built at 144.5 inches wide. |
I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of '''Load E883''', which was built at '''144.5 inches wide'''. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
This one example highlights why we don’t build right up to the 144" limit — there’s no margin for error, and the smallest overage can have significant downstream impact. |
This one example highlights why we don’t build right up to the 144" limit — there’s no margin for error, and the smallest overage can have significant downstream impact. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Thanks for your attention to this. Even one inch can make a big difference when it comes to shipping efficiency, compliance, and cost. |
Thanks for your attention to this. Even one inch can make a big difference when it comes to shipping efficiency, compliance, and cost. |
||
Best regards, |
Best regards, |
||
Regina Marrone |
Regina Marrone |
||
Transportation Manager |
Transportation Manager |
||
P: (770)489-0716 Ext. 1718 |
P: (770)489-0716 Ext. 1718 |
||
F: (678) 766-1039 |
F: (678) 766-1039 |
||
Latest revision as of 20:38, 23 July 2025
Return to Engineering Main Menu
Email from Regina Marrone on 7/23/25
Hi Team,
I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of Load E883, which was built at 144.5 inches wide.
Why This Matters:
Any load over 102 inches (8 feet 6 inches) in width is considered oversize (OD) in every state. That means even if a unit is 103" wide, it's subject to:
- • Permitting requirements
- • Daylight-only travel restrictions
- • No weekend or holiday movement in most jurisdictions
- • Route restrictions and bridge/clearance checks
We try to keep all units at 143 inches or less because 144 inches (12 feet) is a critical regulatory threshold. Once a load hits 144" or more:
- • It enters a higher risk/penalty category
- • Many states begin to require escort vehicles
- • Freight costs rise significantly due to extra coordination, permits, and escorts
Real-World Example – Load E883:
Load E883 was built at 144.5" wide, pushing it over the 12-foot mark. As a result, it now requires:
- • Permits in every state along the route
- • Escort vehicles in several states
- • Compliance with restricted travel hours
- • An estimated $1,000–$1,500 increase in freight cost
This one example highlights why we don’t build right up to the 144" limit — there’s no margin for error, and the smallest overage can have significant downstream impact.
Design Guideline:
- • Please design and quote units at 143" or less
- • Coordinate early with Transportation if wider designs are being considered
- • Verify final specs before release to avoid costly oversize surprises
Thanks for your attention to this. Even one inch can make a big difference when it comes to shipping efficiency, compliance, and cost.
Best regards,
Regina Marrone
Transportation Manager
P: (770)489-0716 Ext. 1718
F: (678) 766-1039