Oversize Threshold and Freight Impact: Difference between revisions

From Seasons 4 Wiki
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<p style="text-align: right;">Return to [[Engineering|Engineering Main Menu]]</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">Return to [[Engineering|Engineering Main Menu]]</p>
<u>Email from Regina Marrone on 7/23/25</u>


Hi Team,
Hi Team,



I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of '''Load E883''', which was built at '''144.5 inches wide'''.
I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of '''Load E883''', which was built at '''144.5 inches wide'''.
Line 8: Line 8:


'''Why This Matters:'''
'''Why This Matters:'''



Any load over '''102 inches (8 feet 6 inches)''' in width is considered '''oversize (OD)''' in every state. That means even if a unit is 103" wide, it's subject to:
Any load over '''102 inches (8 feet 6 inches)''' in width is considered '''oversize (OD)''' in every state. That means even if a unit is 103" wide, it's subject to:


:'''• Permitting requirements'''


'''• Permitting requirements'''
:'''• Daylight-only travel restrictions'''


:'''• No weekend or holiday movement''' in most jurisdictions
'''• Daylight-only travel restrictions'''


:'''• Route restrictions''' and bridge/clearance checks
'''• No weekend or holiday movement''' in most jurisdictions

'''• Route restrictions''' and bridge/clearance checks




We try to keep all units at '''143 inches or less''' because '''144 inches (12 feet)''' is a critical regulatory threshold. Once a load hits 144" or more:
We try to keep all units at '''143 inches or less''' because '''144 inches (12 feet)''' is a critical regulatory threshold. Once a load hits 144" or more:


:'''''' It enters a higher risk/penalty category


:'''''' Many states begin to require '''escort vehicles'''
• It enters a higher risk/penalty category


:'''''' Freight costs rise significantly due to extra coordination, permits, and escorts
• Many states begin to require '''escort vehicles'''

• Freight costs rise significantly due to extra coordination, permits, and escorts




Line 37: Line 34:
Load E883 was built at '''144.5" wide''', pushing it over the 12-foot mark. As a result, it now requires:
Load E883 was built at '''144.5" wide''', pushing it over the 12-foot mark. As a result, it now requires:


:'''• Permits in every state along the route'''


:'''• Escort vehicles''' in several states
'''• Permits in every state along the route'''


:'''''' Compliance with '''restricted travel hours'''
'''• Escort vehicles''' in several states


:'''''' An estimated '''$1,000–$1,500 increase in freight cost'''
• Compliance with '''restricted travel hours'''

• An estimated '''$1,000–$1,500 increase in freight cost'''




Line 52: Line 48:
'''Design Guideline:'''
'''Design Guideline:'''


:'''''' Please '''design and quote units at 143" or less'''


:'''''' Coordinate early with Transportation if wider designs are being considered
• Please '''design and quote units at 143" or less'''

• Coordinate early with Transportation if wider designs are being considered


• Verify final specs before release to avoid costly oversize surprises
:'''''' Verify final specs before release to avoid costly oversize surprises





Latest revision as of 20:38, 23 July 2025

Return to Engineering Main Menu

Email from Regina Marrone on 7/23/25

Hi Team,

I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of Load E883, which was built at 144.5 inches wide.


Why This Matters:

Any load over 102 inches (8 feet 6 inches) in width is considered oversize (OD) in every state. That means even if a unit is 103" wide, it's subject to:

• Permitting requirements
• Daylight-only travel restrictions
• No weekend or holiday movement in most jurisdictions
• Route restrictions and bridge/clearance checks


We try to keep all units at 143 inches or less because 144 inches (12 feet) is a critical regulatory threshold. Once a load hits 144" or more:

It enters a higher risk/penalty category
Many states begin to require escort vehicles
Freight costs rise significantly due to extra coordination, permits, and escorts


Real-World Example – Load E883:


Load E883 was built at 144.5" wide, pushing it over the 12-foot mark. As a result, it now requires:

• Permits in every state along the route
• Escort vehicles in several states
Compliance with restricted travel hours
An estimated $1,000–$1,500 increase in freight cost


This one example highlights why we don’t build right up to the 144" limit — there’s no margin for error, and the smallest overage can have significant downstream impact.


Design Guideline:

Please design and quote units at 143" or less
Coordinate early with Transportation if wider designs are being considered
Verify final specs before release to avoid costly oversize surprises


Thanks for your attention to this. Even one inch can make a big difference when it comes to shipping efficiency, compliance, and cost.


Best regards,


Regina Marrone

Transportation Manager

P: (770)489-0716 Ext. 1718

F: (678) 766-1039