Oversize Threshold and Freight Impact: Difference between revisions

From Seasons 4 Wiki
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<p style="text-align: right;">Return to [[Engineering|Engineering Main Menu]]</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">Return to [[Engineering|Engineering Main Menu]]</p>
<u>Email from Regina Marrone on 7/23/25</u>


Hi Team,
Hi Team,

I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of Load E883, which was built at 144.5 inches wide.
I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of '''Load E883''', which was built at '''144.5 inches wide'''.
Why This Matters:

Any load over 102 inches (8 feet 6 inches) in width is considered oversize (OD) in every state. That means even if a unit is 103" wide, it's subject to:

• Permitting requirements
'''Why This Matters:'''
• Daylight-only travel restrictions

• No weekend or holiday movement in most jurisdictions
Any load over '''102 inches (8 feet 6 inches)''' in width is considered '''oversize (OD)''' in every state. That means even if a unit is 103" wide, it's subject to:
• Route restrictions and bridge/clearance checks

We try to keep all units at 143 inches or less because 144 inches (12 feet) is a critical regulatory threshold. Once a load hits 144" or more:
:'''• Permitting requirements'''
• It enters a higher risk/penalty category

• Many states begin to require escort vehicles
:'''• Daylight-only travel restrictions'''
• Freight costs rise significantly due to extra coordination, permits, and escorts

Real-World Example – Load E883:
:'''• No weekend or holiday movement''' in most jurisdictions
Load E883 was built at 144.5" wide, pushing it over the 12-foot mark. As a result, it now requires:

• Permits in every state along the route
:'''• Route restrictions''' and bridge/clearance checks
• Escort vehicles in several states

• Compliance with restricted travel hours

• An estimated $1,000–$1,500 increase in freight cost
We try to keep all units at '''143 inches or less''' because '''144 inches (12 feet)''' is a critical regulatory threshold. Once a load hits 144" or more:

:'''''' It enters a higher risk/penalty category

:'''''' Many states begin to require '''escort vehicles'''

:'''''' Freight costs rise significantly due to extra coordination, permits, and escorts


'''Real-World Example – Load E883:'''


Load E883 was built at '''144.5" wide''', pushing it over the 12-foot mark. As a result, it now requires:

:'''• Permits in every state along the route'''

:'''• Escort vehicles''' in several states

:'''''' Compliance with '''restricted travel hours'''

:'''''' An estimated '''$1,000–$1,500 increase in freight cost'''


This one example highlights why we don’t build right up to the 144" limit — there’s no margin for error, and the smallest overage can have significant downstream impact.
This one example highlights why we don’t build right up to the 144" limit — there’s no margin for error, and the smallest overage can have significant downstream impact.

Design Guideline:

• Please design and quote units at 143" or less
'''Design Guideline:'''
• Coordinate early with Transportation if wider designs are being considered

• Verify final specs before release to avoid costly oversize surprises
:'''''' Please '''design and quote units at 143" or less'''

:'''''' Coordinate early with Transportation if wider designs are being considered

:'''''' Verify final specs before release to avoid costly oversize surprises


Thanks for your attention to this. Even one inch can make a big difference when it comes to shipping efficiency, compliance, and cost.
Thanks for your attention to this. Even one inch can make a big difference when it comes to shipping efficiency, compliance, and cost.


Best regards,
Best regards,


Regina Marrone
Regina Marrone

Transportation Manager
Transportation Manager

P: (770)489-0716 Ext. 1718
P: (770)489-0716 Ext. 1718

F: (678) 766-1039
F: (678) 766-1039

Latest revision as of 20:38, 23 July 2025

Return to Engineering Main Menu

Email from Regina Marrone on 7/23/25

Hi Team,

I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of Load E883, which was built at 144.5 inches wide.


Why This Matters:

Any load over 102 inches (8 feet 6 inches) in width is considered oversize (OD) in every state. That means even if a unit is 103" wide, it's subject to:

• Permitting requirements
• Daylight-only travel restrictions
• No weekend or holiday movement in most jurisdictions
• Route restrictions and bridge/clearance checks


We try to keep all units at 143 inches or less because 144 inches (12 feet) is a critical regulatory threshold. Once a load hits 144" or more:

It enters a higher risk/penalty category
Many states begin to require escort vehicles
Freight costs rise significantly due to extra coordination, permits, and escorts


Real-World Example – Load E883:


Load E883 was built at 144.5" wide, pushing it over the 12-foot mark. As a result, it now requires:

• Permits in every state along the route
• Escort vehicles in several states
Compliance with restricted travel hours
An estimated $1,000–$1,500 increase in freight cost


This one example highlights why we don’t build right up to the 144" limit — there’s no margin for error, and the smallest overage can have significant downstream impact.


Design Guideline:

Please design and quote units at 143" or less
Coordinate early with Transportation if wider designs are being considered
Verify final specs before release to avoid costly oversize surprises


Thanks for your attention to this. Even one inch can make a big difference when it comes to shipping efficiency, compliance, and cost.


Best regards,


Regina Marrone

Transportation Manager

P: (770)489-0716 Ext. 1718

F: (678) 766-1039