Oversize Threshold and Freight Impact: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hi Team, |
Hi Team, |
||
I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of '''Load E883''', which was built at '''144.5 inches wide'''. |
I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of '''Load E883''', which was built at '''144.5 inches wide'''. |
||
'''Why This Matters:''' |
'''Why This Matters:''' |
||
Any load over '''102 inches (8 feet 6 inches)''' in width is considered '''oversize (OD)''' in every state. That means even if a unit is 103" wide, it's subject to: |
Any load over '''102 inches (8 feet 6 inches)''' in width is considered '''oversize (OD)''' in every state. That means even if a unit is 103" wide, it's subject to: |
||
'''• Permitting requirements''' |
'''• Permitting requirements''' |
||
| Line 16: | Line 20: | ||
'''• Route restrictions''' and bridge/clearance checks |
'''• Route restrictions''' and bridge/clearance checks |
||
We try to keep all units at '''143 inches or less''' because '''144 inches (12 feet)''' is a critical regulatory threshold. Once a load hits 144" or more: |
We try to keep all units at '''143 inches or less''' because '''144 inches (12 feet)''' is a critical regulatory threshold. Once a load hits 144" or more: |
||
• It enters a higher risk/penalty category |
• It enters a higher risk/penalty category |
||
| Line 24: | Line 30: | ||
• Freight costs rise significantly due to extra coordination, permits, and escorts |
• Freight costs rise significantly due to extra coordination, permits, and escorts |
||
'''Real-World Example – Load E883:''' |
'''Real-World Example – Load E883:''' |
||
Load E883 was built at '''144.5" wide''', pushing it over the 12-foot mark. As a result, it now requires: |
Load E883 was built at '''144.5" wide''', pushing it over the 12-foot mark. As a result, it now requires: |
||
'''• Permits in every state along the route''' |
'''• Permits in every state along the route''' |
||
| Line 36: | Line 45: | ||
• An estimated '''$1,000–$1,500 increase in freight cost''' |
• An estimated '''$1,000–$1,500 increase in freight cost''' |
||
This one example highlights why we don’t build right up to the 144" limit — there’s no margin for error, and the smallest overage can have significant downstream impact. |
This one example highlights why we don’t build right up to the 144" limit — there’s no margin for error, and the smallest overage can have significant downstream impact. |
||
Design Guideline: |
'''Design Guideline:''' |
||
• Please '''design and quote units at 143" or less''' |
• Please '''design and quote units at 143" or less''' |
||
| Line 46: | Line 58: | ||
• Verify final specs before release to avoid costly oversize surprises |
• Verify final specs before release to avoid costly oversize surprises |
||
Thanks for your attention to this. Even one inch can make a big difference when it comes to shipping efficiency, compliance, and cost. |
Thanks for your attention to this. Even one inch can make a big difference when it comes to shipping efficiency, compliance, and cost. |
||
Best regards, |
Best regards, |
||
Regina Marrone |
Regina Marrone |
||
Revision as of 20:31, 23 July 2025
Return to Engineering Main Menu
Hi Team,
I want to send a quick reminder about unit width limits, prompted by the upcoming shipment of Load E883, which was built at 144.5 inches wide.
Why This Matters:
Any load over 102 inches (8 feet 6 inches) in width is considered oversize (OD) in every state. That means even if a unit is 103" wide, it's subject to:
• Permitting requirements
• Daylight-only travel restrictions
• No weekend or holiday movement in most jurisdictions
• Route restrictions and bridge/clearance checks
We try to keep all units at 143 inches or less because 144 inches (12 feet) is a critical regulatory threshold. Once a load hits 144" or more:
• It enters a higher risk/penalty category
• Many states begin to require escort vehicles
• Freight costs rise significantly due to extra coordination, permits, and escorts
Real-World Example – Load E883:
Load E883 was built at 144.5" wide, pushing it over the 12-foot mark. As a result, it now requires:
• Permits in every state along the route
• Escort vehicles in several states
• Compliance with restricted travel hours
• An estimated $1,000–$1,500 increase in freight cost
This one example highlights why we don’t build right up to the 144" limit — there’s no margin for error, and the smallest overage can have significant downstream impact.
Design Guideline:
• Please design and quote units at 143" or less
• Coordinate early with Transportation if wider designs are being considered
• Verify final specs before release to avoid costly oversize surprises
Thanks for your attention to this. Even one inch can make a big difference when it comes to shipping efficiency, compliance, and cost.
Best regards,
Regina Marrone
Transportation Manager
P: (770)489-0716 Ext. 1718
F: (678) 766-1039